„Where public order is suspected of failing or
appears to be conspiring with the abusers,
individuals may feel called to act
as wild judges to bring better justice in unjust times.
Once the "order of things" is deligitimized,
improvisations suggest themselves, including those of a rough hand. "
Peter SLOTERDIJK „Zorn und Zeit“ Seite 87 ff
A flood of human tragedies and injustice, due to mishandling under the guise of the Austrian justice system, has been uncovered through the work of Austrian Justice Victim Assistance.
At the moment, therefore, we can only take on new cases after a preliminary examination. In order to be able to determine whether we can make a decisive contribution to the elimination of the injustice concerning you with the means, methods and information collections available to us, we must therefore be able to study your accusations and files in detail in advance.
Therefore, please send us your statement of facts – including all names, as well as the functions of all parties involved, as well as copies of all relevant files and documents.
It is crucial for a successful solution of your problems that you not only send us the facts you have already proved, but also explain to us in detail all your suspicions, fears and assumptions.
Who benefits from the fact that you have been wronged in this way?
Who could have caused your problems ?
As a non-profit aid organization for victims of justice, we naturally treat all your information as strictly confidential.
We primarily take action where there is a reasonable suspicion that
Organs of the judiciary,
organs of the Austrian Financial Procurator’s Office,
liquidators,
lawyers,
experts,
trustees,
trustees of estates etc.
have colluded with injurers to bring about injustice themselves for their own enrichment or support existing injustice for the benefit of third parties and to the detriment of victims of justice instead of fighting it.
Please note that we are generally unable to offer assistance in properly conducted, legal disputes between individuals or companies. In these cases, we can at most arrange detective and investigator services to gather evidence, and publish the modus operandi of their abusers as a warning to other potential victims on one of our websites.
A large part of the judiciary and other organs of justice are undoubtedly striving to fulfill their important task in society with decency and correctness in order to eliminate injustice and thus prevent dangerous discord.
All the more damaging to the reputation of the judiciary are those black sheep and their networks who personally enrich themselves from the plight , inexperience and gullibility of those parties who have uncritically believed the image promoted by the judiciary, according to which the judiciary would be impartial and the laws would apply equally to all strata of society – regardless of their party affiliation, ability to pay and positions of power.
Our central task as Austrian Justice Victim Assistance is to enable the correct majority within the judiciary to separate themselves from these black sheep and not to succumb further to the temptation to silence even blatant abuses to death – in the hope of being able to save the reputation of the judiciary in this way.
The assumption that injustice and pain can be inflicted without consequences and the belief that victims will silently accept the injury and the wounds will fade are very wrong and very dangerous.
The task of Austrian Justice Victim Assistance is to open up new positive future perspectives for existentially injured victims of justice, in order to reduce the danger that hopelessly injured persons succumb to their natural urge to take the law into their own hands.
The task of the Austrian Justice Victim Assistance is to prevent this logically compelling development.
Please send all scanned documents and files by email to
Revision@justizopfer-hilfe.at
or as a package to our post office.
In order to be able to proceed guaranteed completely uninfluenced and only in the interest of the victims of justice, we do not take up any public means.
As soon as the evidence in your case is sufficient, we will – if desired – organize your claim for damages and
a litigation financing with profit sharing for public liability proceedings against the Republic of Austria.
Every company and every family is threatened with total expropriation in the shadow of the Austrian judiciary as soon as members of the social swamp have developed an interest in their assets.
A party-politically dominated, weak judiciary is designed to allow certain groups among Austria’s elites and politicians to enrich themselves safely from other people’s assets. That is why judges and prosecutors are chronically overworked and underpaid. As a result, they are often helpless in the face of semi-professionally planned, less intelligent crime in the private sector. Not to mention professional white-collar crime.
These circumstances enable the NAZI networks and their heirs – which have never been dealt with in Austria – to continue their machinery of dispossession.
The parents’ generation had perfected slander and concentration camp extermination in order to enrich themselves with other people’s family assets.
Today, the heirs of the NAZI generation are satisfied with networked judges and the services of – judicially tolerated – unlawfully certified experts, who deliver compliantly commissioned false expert opinions for the purpose of expropriation of any target person with assets to secure their own existence.
The promised draining of the swamps in Austria was deliberately prevented, just as the Nazi heir generation actively prevents the restitution of all expropriated assets to the Nazi victims and the return of the expelled intellectual elites and nobility to Austria to this day.
Viewed in isolation, the actions of the judiciary highlighted here could be misunderstood as isolated cases.
However, the facts published by Österreichische Justizopfer-Hilfe prove Austria’s deliberate systemic failure.
The Federal Ministry of Justice, under the Federal Minister Dr.in Alma Zadić, LL.M., as well as the Financial Procurator’s Office of the Republic of Austria are helpless in the face of the abuse of justice.
As a logical consequence of this helplessness, victims of judicial abuse receive NO help from the actually appointed control bodies, the Ministry of Justice and the Procurator’s Office, but the opposite.
The attempt to preserve the reputation of the judiciary in public by helping to deny facts in order to cover black sheep in their own ranks cannot be successful.
It motivates the covered perpetrators within the judiciary to ever more flagrant abuse of office and suppression of documents in court and discourages decent judges from standing up to corrupt fellow judges.
Facts are a stubborn thing.
Restoring public confidence in a functioning independent judiciary would be a crucial economic factor for Austria’s tarnished image.
In contrast to Germany, the successful suppression of the Nazi past in Austria has prevented any thorough purge, especially within the judiciary and the mindsets of many judges.
The networks of fraternities, ex-Nazi comrades and “friends” are therefore even more tightly knit in Austria today.
We call on Austrian judges to show backbone and to do the same to their upright, honorable judge colleague from Germany Dr. Frank Fahsel and to report openly about the true conditions within the judiciary.
The reputation of the judiciary, allegedly preserved by their silence, can in reality only be achieved by disclosing and distancing themselves from corrupt unjust verdicts and clear cases of judicial conspiracy with protected groups of perpetrators.
How is the judiciary supposed to function and be able to generate peace between disputing parties if the deep disgust with the judiciary grips even larger parts of the citizens and companies concerned ?
REWARD FOR JUSTICE
The program “Reward for Justice” of the Austrian Justice Victim Assistance offers
rewards in the amount of 100.000.– Euro,
for reliable information leading to the clarification of cases of damage in the amount of 1 million Euro or more.
Rewards in the amount of 100.000.-Euro are offered for all
-
resilient witness statements
-
evidence documents, and
-
verdict-relevant information
with which damages in the amount of 1 million euros or more could be averted before they occurred or successfully recovered after they occurred.
If you have evidentiary information, please contact us.
LANDESGERICHT ZIVILRECHTSSACHEN WIEN
UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA
WHY DOES THIS TOLERANCE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA TOWARDS PROVEN THEFT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND PLAGIARISM HARM THE WHOLE COUNTRY ?
Austria is a small country. There are only a few really good and decisive positions to be filled in every single field of business, administration and justice.
Poor study & professional morals favor the strongly increased willingness to to practice corruption in Austria.
This development is especially threatening in all – non-scientific and technical – disciplines, which leave the „experts“ a large personal scope for interpretation, such as
- Experts in psychology
- Writing experts for the determination of forgeries
- Experts for the valuation of real estate
In the above mentioned fields of expertise – above all – there is always the acute danger that these unqualified experts, unhesitatingly destroy families and human lives of victims seeking protection and help, only to maintain their own swindled source of income.
Above all in these specialized ranges again and again the acute dangers threatens that these unqualified experts destroy families and human lives of protection and assistance-looking for concerning for the preservation of their own source of income unhesitatingly.
The judicial administration repeatedly shows no interest in refusing to certify experts who are proven to be professionally unqualified as court-appointed experts or in rescinding fraudulently obtained certifications of court-appointed experts.
Logically compelling, this only reinforces the urgent suspicion that the judiciary keeps ready court-sworn and certified experts who, in anticipatory obedience, have to run every judicially desired expert report, since their lack of professional qualification and personal integrity is known within the judiciary and is deliberately used as a lever for the instructed political or class-compliant bending of the law.
Logically compelling, this only strengthens the urgent suspicion that the Austrian judiciary is deliberately keeping unsuitable sworn and certified experts at its disposal.
In anticipatory obedience these “experts” must deliver every judicially desired expert opinion.
This is because their intimitating lack of professional qualification and personal integrity is a hidden knowledge within the judiciary – and is deliberately used as leverage for the instructed political or class-compliant bending of the law.
University of Vienna: accepted risk by failing to revoke academic degree of “Expert” Tanja Guserl following her plagiarized diploma dissertation
The renowned plagiarism researcher Doz. Dr. Stefan Weber and his team have prepared a comprehensive plagiarism report on the diploma thesis “Aggressiveness of children and its connection with the occupation of mothers” by Mag. Tanja Guserl from 1997.
Citation:
„ASSESSMENT:
133 plagiarism fragments were identified on the first 64 pages of the thesis.
This is the highest occurrence of plagiarism that has been detected in 15 years of reviewing.
An aggravating factor is that in numerous cases the sources were not only cited ‘on site’ of the copied material, but also not in the bibliography, or at best other sources were cited ‘on site’ and in the bibliography.
The massive plagiarism resulted in the adoption of headings and subheadings and numerous source references from the plagiarized literature.
Literal citations under quotation marks in the thesis indicate that the author must have been aware of the basic citation rules.
In contrast, the author has massively violated the citation rules in numerous other places.In summary:
The theoretical part of the thesis consists to far predominant parts of plagiarism.
Text parts were copied from other sources, whereby mostly no references were made.Particularly serious are the often page-long, not infrequently word-for-word copies of long text sections …
Due to the won realizations it can be stated that it concerns with the examined thesis a serious plagiarism case,
which probably has unavoidable consequences in terms of study law, since the thesis would have had to be graded as “not sufficient” in any case.“
Doz. Dr. Weber has informed the University of Vienna, the responsible
- Mr. Studienpräses Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Peter Lieberzeit
- Mr. A.o. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Michael Trimmel and
- the Dean Univ.-Prof. Dipl.-Psych. Dr. Barbara Schober
and therefore submitted his expert opinion with the following statement at the beginning of January 2022:
Dear Mr. Studienpräses Lieberzeit,
Dear colleague Trimmel,
Dear Dean Schober!Please find enclosed an expert opinion on the occurrence of plagiarism in the diploma thesis “Aggressiveness of children and its connection with the occupation of mothers” by Tanja Guserl, which was accepted in 1997.
I classify the plagiarism in the theoretical part of the thesis as serious and relevant to study law.
Since comprehensive reports of this kind have been accumulating again in recent times (not only at the University of Vienna), I now see this report as a “test case”.
I therefore ask for an appropriate reaction (revocation or non-revocation of the master’s degree) by 01.03.2022.
I am aware of the fact that I will only become aware of the decision of the University of Vienna indirectly.
One more personal word to colleague Trimmel: I appreciate his textbooks, from which I quote again and again, and we have just cooperated profitably in the context of a project on the topic of citation.
I can therefore only express my hope that he, too, cannot come to any other conclusion than that he was considerably deceived by Mrs. Guserl.
LANDESGERICHT SALZBURG
Covered patient murder of a networked doctor – as preparation for probate fraud with falsification of documents
The facts at hand prove that the physician Ernst Dieter Höfer, M.D., Zell am See, out of greed and personal hatred, painfully killed his patient and relative Lydia Wagner by deliberate medical malpractice and subsequently fraudulently enriched himself with elaborately prepared forged deeds. In order to prevent the judicial disclosure of this insidious murder of his patient, he effectively exerted influence on the judiciary in Salzburg with the help of his father Dr. Ernst Höfer – the SPÖ mayor of Zell am See and his network of former leading SS National Socialists . The influence exerted by Judge Dr. Schmidbauer and Judge Dr. Schütz to protect Dr. Höfer caused additional serious damage. The Republic of Austria, represented by the State Financial Procurator’s Office, was requested under the Public Liability Act to take action against the responsible judges of the Salzburg Regional Court for the cover-up of the murder of Lydia Wagner and the associated fraud, and at least to partially compensate the direct financial damage.
The physician Dr. Ernst Höfer was called upon to comment on the accusations against him. He did not contradict the concrete facts at hand, nor did he take any legal steps against their publication that would have made it possible to prove the truth in court.
Expropriation of a family property built up over generations by court-covered document falsifications!
Four court experts have established the document falsifications of Dr. Höfer and his accomplices beyond doubt. All writing characteristics were scientifically analyzed in detail and determined on the basis the numerous Ausbesserungen and Anstückelungen with 99% security a will falsification.
In order to protect Dr. Höfer and his accomplices, the Salzburg Regional Court dismissed all of these expert opinions as false for no reason and reinterpreted the clear forgery features as “fair writing”,
Both the murder of the testatrix Lydia Wagner, and the associated fraudulent embezzlement of extensive real estate shares in favor of Dr. Höfer, were thereby covered up by Dr. Höfer’s network at the Salzburg Regional Court. In order to fasten this factually untenable injustice judgement, in the consequence at the national court Salzburg crucial proofs disappeared in the original from the court file.
In order to protect Dr. Höfer, Judge Dr. Schütz also based his verdict on a verifiable lie about a telephone conversation with a court expert. The court expert disclosed this lie of the Salzburg judge in favor of Dr. Höfer.
In spite of everything, however, the Financial Procurator’s Office, which was called in, fails to make any corrections to the Salzburg Regional Court and even covers up such misconduct, just to be able to maintain the appearance of correct justice at the Salzburg Regional Court in the public eye.
LANDESGERICHT SALZBURG
RICHTER Dr. Franz Schmidbauer & Dr. Johann Schütz
Court-approved expropriation by fraud:
An obvious falsification of the will was confirmed beyond doubt by FOUR court experts.
Due to the joint perpetration of the local politically well-connected family of the former NAZI and Salzburg local politician Ernst Höfer – former mayor of Zell am See – and the sister of the Humanic majority owner, Michael Mayer-Rieckh, Barbara Hirschbäck, the judiciary has refused the judicial confirmation of this falsification of the will (V) since 1993.
Although court opinions confirm the forgery of the will and the origin of the forged document is known, the public prosecutor’s office discontinues the criminal proceedings against all defendants after the intervention of the perpetrators – without ever having heard the defendants.
In the civil proceedings, the Salzburg Regional Court contradicts – without any factual basis – four incriminating expert opinions and approves the fraudulent expropriation.
Despite continuously emerging new evidence of this crime and the admitted trial fraud through falsified evidence, the Salzburg Regional Court continues to protect the perpetrators for years and so far rejects four petitions for rehearing to correct its indisputably wrong judgment granting the fraudulent probate expropriation.
FAKTEN
-
Fakt 1: Gericht unterdrückt Belastungsbeweise ››
-
Fakt 2: Gericht manipuliert Gerichtssachverständige ››
-
Fakt 3: Gericht umgeht Gerichtsgutachten ››
-
Fakt 4: Richter manipuliert Gerichtsgutachten und fordert VOR-Gutachten um Ergebnis vorab zu bestimmen ››
-
Fakt 5: Gericht blockiert Akten bis Strafverjährung zugunsten der Täter ››
-
Fakt 6: Gericht widerspricht ohne Sachgrund rechtskräftigen früheren Urteilen zum Schutz der Täter ››
-
Fakt 7: Gericht beauftragt rechtswidriges Gegengutachten zum Schutz Krimineller >>
-
Fakt 8: Richter verfasst selbst falsche Beweise zum Schutz von Straftätern ››
SIEHE FAKTEN ÜBERSICHT ››
rechtswidrig zertifizierte Gerichtssachverständige
Dr. Marianne Nürnberger
wohnhaft: 8554 SOBOTH, STEIERMARK
The Regional Court of Graz has NOT withdrawn Dr. Marianne Nürnberger’s certification as a handwriting expert, despite her demonstrable lack of qualification, and has thereby condoned further damages endangering her existence due to her false handwriting expert opinions.
The Institute for Austrian Judicial Victim Assistance calls upon all aggrieved parties of false court opinions by Dr. Nürnberger to contact the Institute for the examination and coordination of joint official liability actions against the Republic of Austria, as well as to jointly pursue claims for damages against the grossly negligent expert Dr. Nürnberger.
The Regional Court of Graz did NOT withdraw Dr. Marianne Nürnberger’s certification as a handwriting expert despite her demonstrable knowledge of her lack of qualification, and thereby condoned further damages to her existence due to her false handwriting expert opinions.
Dr. Marianne Nürnberger, certified by the Regional Court of Graz as a handwriting expert, does NOT have the prescribed minimum requirement of expertise and professional experience, which is legally required for the court certification as a sworn and certified court expert for the preparation of forensic handwriting expert opinions!
Due to numerous complaints about professionally untenable false written expert opinions of the court expert Dr. Marianne Nürnberger, the Institute for Austrian Judicial Victim Assistance has informed the responsible president of the Regional Court of Graz about the lack of qualification of the expert Dr. Nürnberger and has filed an application for her deletion from the list of court-certified court experts. (Read and download the application here)
The Institute for Austrian Judicial Victim Assistance calls upon all aggrieved parties of false court opinions by Dr. Nürnberger to contact the Institute for the examination and coordination of joint official liability actions against the Republic of Austria, as well as to jointly pursue claims for damages against the grossly negligent expert Dr. Nürnberger.
